🚀 From Static Models to Living Systems: How Agentic AI is Redefining Enterprise Workflows

Image
For years, AI has been treated like a calculator with a very advanced brain: you give it input, it gives you output. Useful? Yes. Transformative? Not quite. What’s shifting today is the rise of Agentic AI — AI that doesn’t just respond but acts , remembers , adapts , and coordinates . Think less about “getting an answer” and more about “delegating a process.” And here’s the real unlock: agentic systems don’t replace humans, they reshape how work gets done by connecting intelligence with action. 🏢 The Enterprise Pain Points Agentic AI Can Solve Decision Bottlenecks : Reports are generated, but decisions still stall in inboxes. Tool Fragmentation : Finance in Excel, sales in Salesforce, ops in Jira — nothing “talks.” Knowledge Drain : Institutional know-how gets lost when people leave. Process Rigidity : Static rules can’t flex when markets shift overnight. ⚡ Where Agentic AI Shines Instead of simply suggesting, agentic systems execute : Finance : An AI agent d...

Bridging Math and Meaning: Dual-Objective Optimization in Image Captioning

 

In the ever-evolving space of Image Captioning (IC), a persistent challenge has been the loss evaluation mismatch — where models trained to minimize conventional losses like cross-entropy often produce captions that fail to resonate with human evaluators. My recent publication in Springer addresses this gap with a Dual-Objective Optimization (DOO) Framework that directly aligns training with human-centric evaluation.

The Problem

Traditional image captioning models focus heavily on minimizing prediction error, usually via cross-entropy loss. However, what these models miss is what really matters to humans — captions that are linguistically rich, contextually accurate, and meaningful.

This misalignment often results in captions that are technically correct but lack depth, emotional resonance, or visual nuance.

The Solution

The DOO framework simultaneously minimizes training loss and maximizes the BLEU score — a human-centric evaluation metric — during model training.

Mathematical Formulation

The optimization objective is:

                                minθ[L(θ)S(θ)]

where:

  • L(θ) is the training loss (cross-entropy)
  • S(θis the BLEU score-based reward

Key Components

  • Composite Loss Function: Combines traditional cross-entropy loss with a BLEU-based reward.

  • Gradient Approximation: Uses Gumbel-Softmax to make BLEU score differentiable for gradient descent.

  • Reinforcement Learning: Employs policy gradient to optimize for long-term rewards tied to caption quality.

  • Multi-Objective Optimization (NSGA-II): Balances conflicting objectives for better linguistic and contextual results.


Use Case Example


Given an image of a young boy swinging in a park:

  • Base Caption: "A child on a swing."

  • DOO-Generated Caption: "A young boy is swinging on a swing at the playground."

The DOO-generated caption adds nuance and context, capturing both the scene and the human-like expression.

Feel free to read the complete paper herehttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42979-025-04111-0 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TimeGPT: Redefining Time Series Forecasting with AI-Driven Precision

Transformer Architecture in the Agentic AI Era: Math, Models, and Magic

Advanced Object Segmentation: Bayesian YOLO (B-YOLO) vs YOLO – A Deep Dive into Precision and Speed